Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, we have only just been separated for 19 days, and it sounds like the honourable Member already misses Nunavut. Division just happened very recently and, as we know, we are still providing programs and services to Nunavut, so there is still a very close working relationship with the Government of Nunavut. We will be providing the programs and services, as a government, for some time into the future. However, the honourable Member in his Member's statement made reference to the fact that there are architectural firms in this community that were not invited to participate in the public tendering process, I understand in the Member's statement. I think the Member made reference to it. If that is the case, then certainly I think it is a good idea to meet with the Government of Nunavut.
There has already been some discussion with myself and the Cabinet mentioning the fact that we should have some arrangement like a memorandum of understanding of some sort with the Nunavut government. We have that sort of arrangement with other jurisdictions. The Yukon government, for example, the Alberta Government, for example, I think with the Government of Manitoba there was an MOU prior to division. There is a working relationship between different jurisdictions already. This is one possibility of some sort of arrangement rather than a trade mission that we could look at as well. However, I would not mind approaching it by discussion between the Premier of Nunavut as well as the Premier of the Yukon, and see what possibilities there are in terms of a closer working relationship or a continuation of a working relationship between the different companies that are in the Northwest Territories and working in Nunavut. Thank you.