Just very quickly, a couple of other speakers have said that this test of bias is a high standard and it is something that we have to be very careful about. I think the committee was very careful to not be trying to judge whether in fact there was actual bias and simply what I stated earlier, the reasonable apprehension of bias. I could be wrong, but I believe Ms. Lee discussed whether or not -- and she did not have the specific page and I do not either -- whether we were happy that in fact Ms. Roberts had been passive when we might suggest she should have been aggressive at the hearing or in presenting evidence.

If that is what Ms. Lee thought that we had said that, I know that is not at all what we had said. We thought she was too passive with Members in providing conflict avoidance advice generally and also in engaging Members and meeting with Members in order to structure their affairs properly. That is where we had the concerns about passivity. It was not at all with her presenting evidence in front of the committee at the hearings. If that was the impression we left, I apologize because that is certainly not what we were suggesting. Thank you.