Ms. Lee, I am going to stop you here. I am looking at rules and it is becoming evidently clear that the Speaker has a duty to intervene under Rule 23: "In debate, a Member will be called to order by the Speaker if the Member, under section (c), is persistent in needless repetition or raises matters which have been decided during the current session."

I refer further to section (f): "Reflects upon previous vote of the Assembly except for the purpose of moving that it be rescinded."

I am not sure whether or not you are making the best use, in the Chair's opinion, of replying to the opening address. Although it does allow for very wide berth, a very broad spectrum of things that the honourable Members may speak on, I continually hear certain phrases that are difficult for the Chair to accept as part of what is normally a reply to an opening address. Certainly raising the matters which have been decided upon during the current session, these matters were discussed at length yesterday and we continue to hear them now. I would ask you to perhaps focus on something other than that, if it is possible, Ms. Lee.