Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a couple of points in relation to the point of order that I would like to make quickly, Mr. Speaker. Some of them are technical, a couple of them are technical and some are not. I guess I will start with the ones that are not.

First, right off the bat, Mr. Speaker, I had hoped that we had moved past this and could put this behind us, move forward and carry on with the good work that we have to do as a government before us. I do not think it helps us at all to continue to rehash these arguments now in the media. Apparently, we are not moving as quickly ahead as I had hoped we were.

The second point, Mr. Speaker, is to client-solicitor privilege and whether or not that can in fact be waived. If these were Cabinet documents or legal opinions paid for by Cabinet, I am not certain that it would not have to be Cabinet then that waives that privilege.

Mr. Speaker, in addition, we have all been notified through the Commissioner and through yourself that there may be litigation pending. It is possible that some Members of this House, some members of the committee, the government, maybe the Premier, others could be named in such legal action. It seems to me at this point that it would not be appropriate for us to continue to pile on more documentation at this stage and essentially either aid or hinder the possible cases that may come before us.

As Ms. Lee has indicated, there may be political fallout here but certainly our rights are not being infringed. I have never been assured that if I were named in a lawsuit in this matter that my legal costs would be covered. I am not sure that they would, Mr. Speaker, so I do have some concerns and I am not reassured by Ms. Lee's comments here today. Thank you.