Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I wish to speak on the tabled documents. I read the tabled documents and I see them just as a submissions that should have been given to the committee before it was brought to the committee of the whole. The way I read them, they were almost photocopies identical to what the submissions were from the lawyers. That a colleague of ours from this side of the table could table Cabinet documents does not seem right. It makes you want to question what do you do in the House when you work together on one side of the House? After all, you have to be careful. I have to say that these pieces of information should not be tabled. They should have come to us before the committee as a whole. They should have tabled them or even used them and we could have dealt with them then.

It seems to me now that we are going through the whole process again. It seems to me like maybe next week, I am going to have a whole gallery full of my constituents here again. We are repeating the process that we dealt with and we thought was settled. To have documents like this before us again when we are going to possibly have a legal case here, that is not right. I think these documents should be pulled or else maybe we should reopen up the whole case again. Thank you.

Speaker's Ruling