Thank you, Mr. Lafferty. Any further debate? Okay, then debate on the point of order is closed. It is not an easy decision to make off-hand because of the nature of the issue. However, there are certain things that do guide the Chair and the Chair has heard from both sides, so to speak, and is of the opinion, based on what has come out in the debate, that by tabling these documents, the honourable Members have had permission to do this by the authors of the documents and that there are certain responsibilities, along with consequences, of tabling documents that by doing so, this becomes public information. The consequences that flow out of that will be theirs.

The Chair is satisfied that the tabling of the documents is in order and that the documents will be allowed to stay tabled. That is the ruling. The honourable Member has no point of order.

Who has their hand next for what? The honourable Member for Yellowknife South, Mr. Bell.