Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The other area I wanted to touch on sort of came from Mr. Nitah's question. One of the things we do not seem to do enough of is use the people that live on the land to be our eyes and ears that are out there. We see groups such as the Rangers who do work on behalf of the Canadian Armed Forces. We have hunters and trappers that live out on the land. We have people that are out there, but if we somehow expand the responsibilities to not just the game officers, but give responsibilities to the hunters' and trappers' associations, do not give them enforcement powers, but give them the ability that they can monitor or do things on behalf of this government where we might not be able to send our people out to a specific area. If we know there is a trappers' association or a renewable resource board that have people out on the land doing different work or people that are just out there, you could have people go to the East Arm or a particular area so you could identify areas where you can see where somebody either had left garbage or what not.
That is one thing we see a lot of in the Yukon, but we do not see hardly anything on this side of the border where you have a 1-800 number that you call if you see people poaching along the highways or hunting caribou or hunting moose. The renewable resource officers in the communities seem to be registered police officers. Could this government look at working with renewable resource councils, HTAs, and give them more of a monitoring role when it comes to wildlife management?
In the past, we used to have special status for a wildlife officer. There was a local person who worked along with the wildlife officer who did not really have the training...