Mr. Chairman, first of all, without having the hotel tax revenues, it does cause us to have to rethink everything we are doing here, figure out how we are going to do it. I cannot confirm how the $375,000, which was the government's contribution, will be allocated. We had made a commitment to increase our revenue one way or the other if we had hotel tax money. It is my intention to still try to put that $375,000 into tourism. We will do everything we can. We have steps underway, including, as I mentioned before, combining kits, trading investments, saving money there, and so on to be able to do that. We will continue on that track.
Where will that money go? Again, I cannot say today that it is going to go to the tourism association or be split between them and the department. I will have to look at the needs. We only have six positions in our whole tourism section in the department. They have to deal both with tourism development and needs as well as with parks. When you start breaking it down, and one is a director and one is a secretary, there are not many people to divide up.
Having said that, we have to look at our whole tourism support here. I want to have some time to think about it, figure out how we are going to do it. I have to take it back to Cabinet. I think without that other source of revenue, it means going back to the drawing board. We certainly cannot strip the department completely and turn it all over to the tourism association, unless it is a clear decision to set up a tourism authority independent of government and have very little responsibility there. Thank you.