Mr. Speaker, I have checked into this one. Let me tell you that on the project that Mr. Krutko is referring to, the Highway No. 8 project, which is reconstruction from kilometre 0 to kilometre 257, this is one project with a value of $500,000. It covers a whole bunch of activities within that one project, but it is all one project. That is the way it was approved in the main estimates. If you check the main estimates, you will see one project.

When it comes to the Financial Administration Manual, the manual says that:

When a department makes any adjustment to a capital project which significantly affects the scope or timing of the project, the responsible Minister will advise the appropriate MLA and standing committee.

In this case, there was some money moved around from one aspect of the project to another one, but the scope of the whole project remained the same. The timing of the project has essentially remained the same. Even though there was movement from culverts to bridge or whatever it may have been, there has been no substantial change at all to the project as a project. Therefore, there is no violation of the Financial Administration Act or the manual. Thank you.