Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, this submission in the fall is very important. The consultation now is very important for us, and it will result in DIAND coming forward to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board with a submission. This submission will trigger a lengthy controversial environmental assessment in the licensing process. There is a mechanism in place for our participation in this regard. Up to this point in time, there was no plan. They were looking at options. There are different ranges of options that are there. The removal of the arsenic trioxide is $300 million plus. That is our first preferred option to go. We would indicate that through the environmental assessment licensing process, which this fall's submission will trigger off. Thank you.
Jim Antoine on Question 117-14(5): GNWT Role In Giant Mine Cleanup
In the Legislative Assembly on March 1st, 2002. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 117-14(5): GNWT Role In Giant Mine Cleanup
Question 117-14(5): GNWT Role In Giant Mine Cleanup
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 28th, 2002
Page 284
Jim Antoine Nahendeh
See context to find out what was said next.