Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Another area that I would like to touch on is where you have programs to help with public housing and there is a distinct need out there for somebody who is really badly in need, maybe a single mother with kids who is trying to secure a place of residence for herself and is involved in maybe a court battle with an ex-husband or something and is looking for a short-term solution to a funding problem.

What are the latitudes that the people within the NWT Housing Corporation who are administering the programs have? How much latitude do they have to stray from the hard lines that the programs call for when you look at an individual? Can you look at an individual case with somebody and say, "Okay, well maybe we can come up with a short-term solution to this," or is it cut and dried with the programs that the people cannot stray at all and try and help somebody that is in core need? Where does the decision have to go for somebody to finally say, "We are going to help this person on a short-term basis so that they do not get put out on the street or they are not rendered homeless because of policy lines that we have to follow?" Thank you, Mr. Chairman.