Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I think that is actually a good suggestion that Mr. Lafferty is asking about because I think this issue may not go away. This issue might be on the table for a long time and it is time, I think, that we got some feedback perhaps from people, but also then be able to put it before the Members, to say okay this is the intent of the program, here is what it is all about and are we still in agreement with that. I think you have a good suggestion, let's get some information from people. We can do some survey work, I think it can be very basically done. I don't think we need a lot of complicated work done on this because we have a lot of information already and we know people's comments from time to time. We can put that before the Members. Perhaps the next Legislative Assembly could consider this as a very important element. Do we redesign this program, or do we keep it the way it is? I think we have to look at the philosophy of it. Thank you.
Jake Ootes on Question 360-14(6): Clawback Of The National Child Benefit Supplement
In the Legislative Assembly on October 2nd, 2003. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 360-14(6): Clawback Of The National Child Benefit Supplement
Question 360-14(6): Clawback Of The National Child Benefit Supplement
Item 7: Oral Questions
October 1st, 2003
Page 1155
See context to find out what was said next.