Okay. So we don't require the capital upgrade, but when we met in March in the House, Mr. Lafferty was asking...Maybe it was Mr. Krutko asking the question -- yes, it was -- and Mr. Aumond answering on behalf of the department said that with respect to Tuk, the cleanup itself was estimated to be $500,000 or $600,000. Then he goes on to say it's worth noting that once that cleanup happens it's going to be incumbent upon whoever undertakes that cleanup to undertake a code upgrade to the facility, which is going to be a $1.5 to $2 million capital investment required on top of the cleanup. So the total cost will be to the GNWT or, in this case through EGT in Tuk, and you look at those two together, you are looking at a $2 million commitment minimum after taking possession of the tank farm. Are we saying we are not requiring that capital investment or it's just a suggestion on our part or a good idea? Thank you.
Brendan Bell on Bill 32: Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 2, 2003-2004
In the Legislative Assembly on October 7th, 2003. See this statement in context.
Bill 32: Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 2, 2003-2004
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
October 7th, 2003
Page 1292
See context to find out what was said next.