Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The supp notes indicate because of some bookkeeping and it looks to me like a transfer from a capital expenditure to an O and M expenditure, that is the reason for this showing up here. I guess my question is more back to the Minister of Finance, what is the explanation here for this shift in allocation? It's a fair amount of money, $250,000. Could we get an explanation for that?
Bill Braden on Bill 32, Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 2, 2002-2003
In the Legislative Assembly on October 8th, 2003. See this statement in context.
Bill 32, Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 2, 2002-2003
Revert To Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
October 7th, 2003
Page 1322
See context to find out what was said next.