In the Legislative Assembly on October 8th, 2003. See this topic in context.

Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1319

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my questions are again for the Minister of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development in follow up to questions on the arsenic situation at Giant. I think as I've made very clear, people are concerned about the lack of activity in terms of getting the process started, and are very interested in knowing what the timetable is. The Minister yesterday talked about the plan for dealing with the arsenic to have to go through an assessment. Could he outline the steps and the timetable for getting approval for the project, and especially could he outline if part of the requirement is a full-blown environment assessment? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Dent. The honourable Minister of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my understanding of the process is it is a DIAND process. The information we have is once DIAND has decided to submit a recommendation on the management of the arsenic stored underground at Giant to the federal senior management, I understand that they're timetable is that they plan to do that in the fall of 2003. So we're in that area, probably later this month or November we would anticipate that. So we expect that the recommended management option will probably be the frozen block disposal method. We as a government can only advise, but this is what we anticipate will happen. Any final management alternative must effectively isolate the arsenic from people and the environment, so of course we are all supportive of that. My understanding is that once that happens, once DIAND has decided to take a course of action, then a project description would be submitted to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board. The information that we have is that this is the course of action that has been taken. It would probably involve an environmental assessment and a review process would probably trigger. So that would be some time, and we know how these processes have been proceeding in all these different area. The arsenic stored underground at Giant is a huge concern to everybody, including people down the valley because that's where the river flows. So of course we are very concerned about it, and the submission that land and water board will receive, it will probably take some time to make sure that all the different stakeholders will have input into that.

Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. Dent.

Supplementary To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Minister indicates that he thinks a full environmental assessment would likely be required of the project, once that project description is filed. As I understand it, an EA can be required by stakeholders requesting that that happen. Is it this government's position that a full-blown EA is necessary? Will this government be triggering the environmental assessment?

Supplementary To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Dent. The honourable Minister of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Mr. Speaker, it's not the intention of our government to trigger any environmental assessment. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

October 7th, 2003

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. Dent.

Supplementary To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, that answered my first question if the Minister could give an outline of what he understand the timetable to be; he indicated it would be a fair while, he thought. Does he have an estimate of what this government expects to be the start date for the cleanup of the Giant site?

Supplementary To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Dent. The honourable Minister of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Mr. Speaker, I cannot provide the estimate of when we think the startup of the clean-up at Giant Mine is going to be. The information that we have is it will have to be after the regulatory process is completed. That's my understanding at this point in time. I could only speculate on how long that process is going to be at this point. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Your final supplementary, Mr. Dent.

Supplementary To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, do we have to wait until the final plan is filed before we can start on the surface reclamation? Is there any reason not to start that immediately?

Supplementary To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Dent. The honourable Minister of RWED, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Mr. Speaker, I will have to check on that, but the main concern is the arsenic trioxide that is underground. That is where the big price tag is going to be for the federal government to come up and how they are going to put that together. As for the surface cleanup, it's also a huge concern and I cannot really answer the Member's question and I have to take it as notice and get back to him as soon as possible. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Question 411-14(6): Approval For Giant Mine Remediation Project
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 1320

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you. That part of the question was taken as notice. The time for question period has expired. Item 7, written questions. The honourable Member for Great Slave, Mr. Braden.