Thank you, Mr. Speaker. That's great. That's the kind of approach that I can support. In my statement, Mr. Speaker, I suggested that rather than taking a yearly approach, that we could potentially look at it, for instance, in the four-year term that we come into office for. If we look, for instance, at our $75 million capital budget this year, that becomes a $300 million capital budget and something that potentially has more opportunities and flexibility. Is this the kind of criteria that could be incorporated as an option in this new policy? Thank you.
Bill Braden on Question 28-14(6): Review Of The Corporate Capital Planning Process
In the Legislative Assembly on February 17th, 2003. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 28-14(6): Review Of The Corporate Capital Planning Process
Question 28-14(6): Review Of The Corporate Capital Planning Process
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 16th, 2003
Page 100
See context to find out what was said next.