Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I was hoping to address some of this stuff under detail, but with the new information provided by the Minister since our go-round yesterday, and with respect to the facilities that came into question yesterday about the residences in the NWT, I have gone through the pieces of information the Minister has provided. Knowing these are somewhat dated, June 2000, both for the Green House report and the Brown House report and looking at the summaries and looking at the e-mail that is attached to this from the assistant fire marshal, I just have a hard time justifying this, as I said yesterday. The decisions we make are only as good as the information that is provided. I thank the Minister for providing this information, but on the executive summary of the Brown House report dated June 14, 2000, the most significant of which is the practice of blocking fire doors in the open position. Now that's in the paragraph...I guess we should start off at the beginning of the sentence. "In addition to the health issues, this building also suffers from fire safety problems, the most significant of which is the practice of blocking fire doors in the open position." Then there is a lack of fire separations, inadequate protection of exits, inoperative doors and hardware and then from the Green House report of the same date, June 14, 2000, "in addition to the health issues related to mildew, this building also suffers from fire safety problems such as lack of fire separations, inadequate protection of exits and inoperative doors and hardware."

These are almost three years old, a couple more months and they will be three years old. The e-mail that we are having a chance to look at here is dated January 20, 2003, and it says that they are making a list of fire safety deficiencies that require immediate attention. Does the Minister or the staff have that list?