Thank you, Madam Chair. I am looking at the explanation in the information attached to the supp which says the net effect to the government operations is nil because there is an offsetting reduction to the department's capital investment funding. I guess I don't see where there is a way that a community has been able to scoop some extraordinary funding. I hope I have the interpretation correct here. If my understanding of this request is right then, I will be voting against the motion. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Bill Braden on Committee Motion 78-14(6): To Delete $378,000 From Bill 11: Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 2003-2003, Under Maca, Operations Expenditures, Regional Operations, Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on March 12th, 2003. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 78-14(6): To Delete $378,000 From Bill 11: Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 2003-2003, Under Maca, Operations Expenditures, Regional Operations, Defeated
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 12th, 2003
Page 741
See context to find out what was said next.