Thank you, Madam Chair. I would just like to confirm a couple of things here. One is that this is already funding that the hamlet of Tuktoyaktuk had already been...the appropriation had already been approved. What we are doing here in a wordy and complex way is to give authorization to move it from what had been previously authorized as capital into O and M. Do I have that right? This is just a long complex round-about way of authorizing a change from a capital to an O and M expenditure. Is that accurate? Can someone help me there, Madam Chair?
Bill Braden on Committee Motion 78-14(6): To Delete $378,000 From Bill 11: Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 2003-2003, Under Maca, Operations Expenditures, Regional Operations, Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on March 12th, 2003. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 78-14(6): To Delete $378,000 From Bill 11: Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 2003-2003, Under Maca, Operations Expenditures, Regional Operations, Defeated
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 12th, 2003
Page 741
See context to find out what was said next.