Thank you, Mr. Antoine. Mr. McLeod.

Mr. Chairman, the tourist information booth that the community of Enterprise is trying to set up also caters to the rubber-tire tourists, or whatever the Minister calls them. It's the same kind of set-up, except one is community driven. Maybe the Minister could explain to me what is the difference? How does one get classified as a territorial facility if it's providing information and we have another community-driven initiative that doesn't get recognized at all?

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Antoine.

Thank you, Mr. Antoine. We're on capital acquisition plan for Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development. Mr. McLeod.

Mr. Chairman, I also wanted to ask some questions regarding the Hook Lake recovery herd that we have in the Fort Resolution area. Is there any infrastructure located in that whole initiative?

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Antoine.

Thank you. Mr. McLeod.

Mr. Chairman, the Minister kind of went into the direction that I was planning on asking questions on. I wanted to know if there was going to be any consideration to invest any more money into facilities and maintenance on the Hook Lake herd. My concern is where are we going with that whole initiative? I don't know what we are we waiting for the federal government for. Where are we planning to put this? Are we planning to build another holding area? It's not clear to me by his answer. I realize the Minister has indicated that they are a tame herd. I don't know if we want them brought over to Fort Providence. I think there would be some concern, certainly if they are tame and are going to be wandering around the community. We already have problems in that area.

If the Minister could be a little more specific and give me some direction as to where the herd will go. Are we looking at spending more money for a holding facility? It's obvious that we can't release them back into the general area that they were taken from. I don't believe they are generating any revenue and the herd, I am assuming, is still growing yet we haven't identified what the end result is going to be, what further investment it's going to require, what further facilities we are going to need. So if the Minister could be a little more specific.

Thank you. Mr. Antoine.

Thank you, Mr. Antoine. Mr. McLeod.

I have been trying to follow the way calculations are done regarding the use of campgrounds. We have several facilities in my riding, quite a few of them actually, and I see a lot of use of these facilities. For the most part, I would consider them tourist or out-of-town visitors. At the same time, we see other facilities that are considered high use. If you go into some of the campgrounds around Yellowknife, there are a lot of resident people using them. I am not trying to state one is better than the other, but in terms of territorial investment, I would consider maybe some of these should be regarded as community campgrounds rather than territorial campgrounds. I am just wondering if this department tracks the people who utilize these facilities, if they track them and differentiate between community use and out-of-town use or tourist use.

Thank you. Mr. Antoine.

Thank you, Mr. Antoine. We are on cap 25, total resource management and economic development, $1.385 million.

Forest management, total forest management, $1.550 million.

Total department, $2.935 million.

Does the committee agree that that concludes the review of the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development?