Thank you, Mr. Speaker. First I would say that I'm interested myself in more detail as to what the public meetings will comprise at the end of April, and I'll get that information and commit to provide that to all Members. I think it's important that we understand exactly what the process is. The Member is certainly aware that there was an application made by the city for an environmental assessment. It was made to the Impact Review Board, not the Water Board. That decision just came down in January from the Impact Review Board, and they indicated there was no mechanism for a full environmental assessment because they are operating under the terms of the existing licence. I will endeavour to determine how information is coming back to the department. I do know that at this point the department seems satisfied that work is progressing in the manner and in the order that it should. So I will determine what the reporting is like internally and get back to the Member on what additional detail I can provide. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Brendan Bell on Question 20-15(2): Abandonment And Restoration Of Miramar Con Mine
In the Legislative Assembly on January 21st, 2004. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 20-15(2): Abandonment And Restoration Of Miramar Con Mine
Question 20-15(2): Abandonment And Restoration Of Miramar Con Mine
Item 6: Oral Questions
January 20th, 2004
Page 35
See context to find out what was said next.