Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, if the Member wants a copy of the RFP that went out, I'll gladly provide one. The fact is, an RFP went out, responses were received, it was a public exercise and we received three responses. From that, we deemed that they all did not fit the criteria for one reason or another, whether the offer that was made did not fit the question for adequate space or storefront, or easy access, downtown, or the timelines. Based on phone calls we had with these companies, individuals from those companies, we went and discussed with the Legal Services Board what we felt was a viable option. On that we've offered a five-year lease with two options of five years. That can be reviewed if it's felt that at the end of the first term it is not appropriate to continue with that. Thank you.
Floyd Roland on Question 238-15(3): New Legal Aid Office Lease
In the Legislative Assembly on October 18th, 2004. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 238-15(3): New Legal Aid Office Lease
Question 238-15(3): New Legal Aid Office Lease
Item 6: Oral Questions
October 17th, 2004
Page 805
See context to find out what was said next.