Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I guess the CATSA segment of the expenditure for the bomb detection equipment, that is one thing, Mr. Chairman. I think the public could accept the fact that that was going to happen and we would need to spend a little bit of money. In the grand scheme of things, what's happening at the Yellowknife airport, from the information that I have, is a full blown expansion, both to the apron, both to the terminal building itself and we are adding an annex. We have seen them at the Edmonton International Airport. They are ATCO trailers. They are just an add-on, Mr. Chairman. Again, I will get back to the process here. There was no consultation with stakeholders at the airport. There was no consultation with the city of Yellowknife and there was no consultation with the Members of this House. Mr. Chairman, I find that completely unacceptable.

I don't know how else to say it, but it shouldn't have happened this way. You can wrap it all you want in the CATSA argument and the fact that the bomb detection equipment had to go in, but the stakeholders, the city of

Yellowknife and the residents of the Northwest Territories deserve better than what's happening here and the fact that we are going to try to recoup the cost over the next few years out of airport user fees is quite alarming, Mr. Chairman. I don't know exactly how it's going to work with the money in user-fees coming back to the government. Is it going to go back into the general revenue into the black hole or how is that money going to be applied, Mr. Chairman? Thank you.