Thank you. I guess from a Member's point of view, it certainly would have been nice to deal with this issue in the May-June session. I can appreciate that FMBS may have screened it out, but this is a decision before the House and I would have thought that hearing some of the timelines of the organization in May, how we were able to get our numbers together for the bodies portion, the workers portion for the May session. I find that almost kind of strange not to have been brought to us in May. I'm sure there is a reason why it wouldn't have been brought to Members for a full discussion during the House in May.

I'm sure there are steps that FMBS must have the final say before it sees all Regular Members, but I'm a little surprised that things couldn't have come directly to us in that particular case, noting the time windows. I would challenge the Minister by saying that I thought he said September it would be open, not October. So there were tight timelines at the time. I'm just a little surprised and I think I go back to what I in my earlier comment in that I think we're dealing with a special warrant issue and the fact that it seems to fly very low under the radar of Regular Members and it just seems to pop up long after the money has been spent. The fact is, in this particular case we don't have that space -- we may through a contract have that space -- but we don't have that space as of today and that money isn't being spent as of today on a fit-up at this moment. Potentially on a fit-up, I should say as well, because it's not really clear whether we're paying for this space or not. When it comes to the fit-up, that still has to flush itself out. Mostly a comment, but I have no doubt our loyal Minister will have some comments to provide back. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.