I think the Member makes a very good point. I think one thing is certain, and that is that this pipeline initiative not only has the attention of the federal government, but has the attention of the whole country, and certainly, as well, the United States. So I think it's the perfect vehicle to raise the profile of some of our smaller, more remote communities, and make sure that the country and the federal government understands the challenges and the hurdles.
Just as an aside, when we talk about programs like the one that the Arctic Energy Alliance was able to use for energy audits, the federal funding that was to flow was based around a model that would have independent contractors going around doing these energy audits, and there was so much mileage allowance per audit. They figured if you had to travel between communities they would provide for so much mileage for you to drive, not recognizing, of course, that we have to fly to most of our more remote communities in order to even be able to do these energy audits. So you can see the kinds of things that we're up against. The business model that's used to develop a lot of these federal programs simply doesn't fit our needs, and that's why we have to continue to make the federal government aware of our unique challenges. Clearly it's much easier to get around Prince Edward Island than it is the Northwest Territories, and you can do it much more cheaply. So those unique challenges have to be factored into the funding models or we won't be even at step one. Thank you.