I think absolutely there has to be some relationship to the devolution file. I don't think you can dissect these issues and not have the clear linkages between them. But what I'm proposing at this point, and we've had some discussion about this at Cabinet, we are hoping to come back to committee with sort of a proposed terms of reference to get the feedback of the committee. I think at that point when we're establishing the mandate of the committee, it will be important to have these kinds of thoughts and ideas come forward from AOC so that we make sure that...The challenge here is to have it as comprehensive and wide reaching as possible, but not to let it get too broad and so vague that we aren't able to achieve some concrete objectives.
So we will have to sit down and I will take the Member's advice on that, but we will have to sit down and talk about what the most effective mandate possible would be within our area of responsibility. Clearly there will be some overlap here and some discussion about the current regime under the federal government control and future regime when we strive to have control and when there are these provincial-type responsibilities that have been transferred to us. Obviously we recognize we also have to target other groups and other federal departments. The Department of Industry Canada is an obvious one. We can't simply look at DIAND. I think the Member has already made this point. We need to look beyond that. We need to look at all the other mechanisms and agencies that play a role. Thank you.