Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Mr. Minister. That's a very inspiring comment. It brings warmth to many constituents out there concerned with the existing Planning Act. I'm sure there will be many happy faces when they hear that. Then again, maybe not many happy faces after the results.

Just one last comment and then even I will yell for detail. I just want to pass a comment along in regard to the $495,000 being spent for forced growth in order to keep up with the property assessment function. Maybe not necessarily looking through a question, but just a compliment in the sense that it's good that Municipal and Community Affairs is attempting to keep up with consistent assessment updating their acts and obviously this will spill out too. Although, the fact that there will probably be more reviews. No one likes to see the tax man come to town, but consistent tax application, as far as property tax, is healthy, therefore, it avoids any shock to the system such as communities may receive when they realize that their property assessments have not been assessed on a regular basis and probably assessed unfairly in the sense of not being reasonable. When they're quickly brought up to date that puts communities in a difficult position to understand that or accept that. Therefore, political intervention is sometimes required in order to find a happy middle. Therefore, I welcome this growth because I think that will again apply fair consistency to tax-based communities which probably are a little more regular on assessment reviews. I wish to lend my support to that one specifically. Thank you, Mr. Minister, and thank you, Mr. Chairman.