Thank you, Madam Chair. Just noting a note I got here from Chief Archie Catholique of Lutselk'e Dene First Nations stressing the need that the sewage truck is being underutilized. They are only using it when they deem it absolutely necessary that it has to go to a certain number of houses per day. They are trying to minimize the use of the truck, just due to the fact that now they have to wait one more year and will probably expend more municipal dollars on the upkeep and the maintenance to keep this truck going, as well with the depreciation of the garbage truck. I'm just wondering if any extra dollars will be given to municipal operations and maintenance for the upkeep or the extra money required to keep these vehicles on the road. Is that taken into consideration when commitments like this are suddenly bumped one or two years down the road with the government's re-appropriation of funds? I'm wondering if new monies are going to the council just so they can keep these vehicles in working order for the extra year or two that they have to use them. Thank you.
Robert Villeneuve on Committee Motion 9-15(3): Recommendation To Remove Funding For New Property Assessors From 2004-05 Main Estimates, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 26th, 2004. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 9-15(3): Recommendation To Remove Funding For New Property Assessors From 2004-05 Main Estimates, Carried
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 26th, 2004
Page 384
See context to find out what was said next.