Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I guess there is a question as to which is more important. The program pays right now the full cost of rent. So there is an agreement that is not calculated as part of the amount that you have to justify. The program does pay the full cost, but most other things are considered the client's choice. The expenses are added up as to what a person has and brings to the table, and then an amount is provided as a top up. So it's entirely up to people right now to decide whether they choose to spend the money on a phone. It's essential to point out that there have been arguments that our program is not efficient, we have way above anybody else in terms of benefits. There is nobody else in Canada that comes close to what we provide in benefits in income support. So it's a very good program. Does it need to have attention paid to it? It probably does. That's why I am committed to reviewing it with the standing committee. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Charles Dent on Question 198-15(3): Eligible Income Support Expenses
In the Legislative Assembly on June 2nd, 2004. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 198-15(3): Eligible Income Support Expenses
Question 198-15(3): Eligible Income Support Expenses
Item 6: Oral Questions
June 1st, 2004
Page 699
See context to find out what was said next.