Well, it's a well-informed response, Madam Chair. Even in our world here, $230,000 to sort of study and coordinate the work of -- not to diminish their importance -- but a few dozen specialists and professionals, a quarter of a million dollars? It seems excessive, but I have no other basis other than just a sense of what the ratios are here. I don't see the value in this, given the quantity of information that we already have to deal with. I like to take the expertise that's available wisely in our own workforce so we can help sort this out. I don't know. I'll see whether any other Members, anybody else from Social Programs or somebody has a view on that one.
The third topic that I wanted to raise here, Madam Chair, was on the area of the $1 million for the planning and design work of a dementia facility. I'm amply on record as being a supporter of this, and really pleased to see us moving to this degree of sort of certainty and commitment. The question that I have, Madam Chair, and if you will permit me to skip ahead a few pages in the supp to page 25, actually, where there is an almost identical set of projects identified, funded by federal health care dollars, for planning and design work for upgrades to long-term care facilities. Essentially, what is the difference between those long-term care facilities, which, I understand, are in many other communities and apply to seniors and those with perhaps more cognitive health issues, what is the difference between planning for those, funded by the federal government, and the territorial dementia facility in Yellowknife, funded out of our coffers? Is there any chance we could get the feds to pay for that, too?