Thank you, Madam Chair. Just with respect to the transfer of funds, and to the motion to delete extra positions, I am not too sure how we need more positions, particularly if no one has explained to me about how it ran in the Housing Corporation. If the Housing Corporation did really keep eight positions for people needed to run this program, someone has never told me. But just with respect to creating new positions, at this point, I agree with my honourable colleague, Mr. Ramsay. There is something fundamentally wrong here. It appears to me that it is not being followed through.
As well, I spoke on this issue many times, as well. Basically, it is the whole harmonization issue that is coming through here. I was fundamentally against transferring any of the housing programs over to ECE. Now it is getting even worse. We are going to transfer money over, and now we want to create a whole bunch of positions. I have always maintained, as well, that programming dollars are important. If you are going to add $1 million in salaries, out of $30 million, that is getting up there in terms of administration costs to programming dollars, right up to unacceptable levels. I am not too sure the Housing Corporation handled $30 million in housing rental subsidies. I don't think they did it right with eight people, either. I thought they kind of transferred it over to the LHOs, but for ECE to do it and require seven people to do it, I am not too sure. I have always said it is better left in the Housing Corporation, and I maintain that. Just with that respect, it doesn't appear to be fully thought out. With that, I will be supporting this motion.