Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as I stated, we are redefining the mandate of the corporation. We will be looking, and discussing with the Members, and also going out for public input in regard to the mandate of the corporation on exactly how we're going to function going forward. As a corporation, we depend on our programs, which are application-based. A lot of people just do not like the answer of being told no, but I think they have to realize the reason that you have application-based programs is to ensure that you are fair to the individuals, but also ensure that the information that is being provided is accurate, and also that you are able to sustain those programs. So again, I offer to the Member that we will be reviewing the mandate of the corporation. We will be going out for public input from the communities, and also from the general public. At that point, that's when I believe the issue can be brought up, by looking at how the application programs are going to be administered, but also allowing for an appeal process.
David Krutko on Question 297-15(4): Appeal Of Housing Corporation Program Decisions
In the Legislative Assembly on October 27th, 2005. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 297-15(4): Appeal Of Housing Corporation Program Decisions
Question 297-15(4): Appeal Of Housing Corporation Program Decisions
Revert To Item 7: Oral Questions
October 26th, 2005
Page 632
See context to find out what was said next.