Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I guess it's one thing we can say in the North and the rest of Canada is that the diamond industry is small in our jurisdiction and the word and rumours spread fast about what's happening. We're aware there's significant interest with the operations. As well, the way it's been working through a court appointed receiver, the receiver will have to make those contacts, look at what the results of those contacts can bring and then advise us of what the potentials are. If there's a deal to be had, they would recommend a movement on that and whatever deal is worked on would have to be sanctioned by the courts. Again, because we have a court appointed receiver, that process is quite formal. I'm quite confident that we will have a final decision as to if, in fact, we are moving and entered into a serious set of negotiations once again by April. I think we should have some information before then, but again, because this is a court appointed receiver and the process is quite formal, we know that we could, for example if things moved along front end quite quickly, decide if, in fact, one of the proponents coming forward was satisfactory. We would once again go through the process of doing our due diligence and deciding if the company is satisfactory, would meet our criteria for a northern manufacturer, then that process would again kick up to the mines to have them set up their agreement for a supply of rough. If that can come together, then it would go back to the courts and through the court process. There's a 30-day appeal period. Once that period ends then the deal can be officially signed off.

I'm fairly confident that before April 1st we will have direction that we will go in, whether it's a proposal that's good enough to move forward on or, as a government, we re-evaluate where we're standing with the ongoing concern of the facility. Thank you.