Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate that costs would more or less be at the expense of the developer and then, of course, the occupants or the customers, but surely there are purely public infrastructure costs. Would we be potentially looking at, say, the need for a new fire hall or schools or parks or recreation? These are very distinct responsibilities at the territorial level. So I just want to get a sense, Mr. Speaker, what kind of obligations would we be looking ahead to, to perhaps enable this to happen? Thank you.
Bill Braden on Question 430-15(3): Responsibility For Funding Housing Infrastructure Development
In the Legislative Assembly on February 18th, 2005. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 430-15(3): Responsibility For Funding Housing Infrastructure Development
Question 430-15(3): Responsibility For Funding Housing Infrastructure Development
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 17th, 2005
Page 1369
See context to find out what was said next.