Just a very short addition to that, as the Member for Hay River South mentioned earlier, there are many priorities that Members of this House have stated with regard to their priorities for Justice and that is what we are supposed to be doing. We are doing exactly what we would like the Minister and the government to know in terms of what we think should be done. I think this motion should be taken as a recommendation in a consensus government for the government to review the decision that they have made. It doesn't necessarily mean that the department has to eat whatever is the lost revenue or the budget deficit from within. I would like to ask FMB to consider bringing a supplementary appropriation forward, if they try to meet these deficits from within and can't do it without cutting the essential programs that we have all suggested.

I do appreciate the Minister's position. At one point or another we are all speaking to priorities, but the Member for Hay River South and I have been here long enough to know that it doesn't necessarily have to be that way. The government does have means and ways to find money when the majority of Members have stated a priority. So I just wanted to make it clear that endorsement of this motion is on the merit of the motion. I have already explained that and it doesn't say anything about lessening other priorities we have stated in other areas. I don't think it has to necessarily be that way. Thank you.