Thank you, Mr. Chairman. In this area and in a couple of other programs in pages yet to come I see a very welcome expenditure here for homelessness and people encountering potentially emergency situations and we are putting assets at the disposal of communities large and small. By my math, there is somewhere in the neighbourhood of $376,000 spread amongst a couple of different departments. Mr. Chairman, while I see this, as I said, as a very welcome response and recognition to a situation out there on our streets, I'm wondering if this is potentially the beginning of creating another realm in our social programs and safety net agenda, Mr. Chairman. I haven't seen anything framed up quite this way before. Are we expanding or potentially taking on a new prerogative here, a new mandate as regards the response to homelessness? Is there generally a policy basis that supports this? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Bill Braden on Committee Motion 40-15(3) To Amend Bill 17 To Come Into Force On The Earlier Of The Prorogation Of The First Session Of The 38th Parliament And The Coming Into Force Of The Civil Marriage Act (canada), Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on March 9th, 2005. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 40-15(3) To Amend Bill 17 To Come Into Force On The Earlier Of The Prorogation Of The First Session Of The 38th Parliament And The Coming Into Force Of The Civil Marriage Act (canada), Defeated
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 9th, 2005
Page 1937
See context to find out what was said next.