Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I guess I can argue all day with the Minister about what the scope of the project actually entails. Mr. Chairman, when I see a project at $2.4 million that was going to take place in Yellowknife in the Member for Great Slave's constituency and that project moves a seven-hour drive away, a half-hour flight away south of Great Slave Lake, obviously the scope of that project has got to change, Mr. Chairman. I'm wondering if the Minister can tell us what his definition of the scope of the project really is, and why the Member wasn't informed and the standing committee wasn't informed when it's obvious the scope of the project changed.

We're talking about apples and oranges here, Mr. Chairman. It's not the same project. It's obvious to anybody that it's not the same project. The scope absolutely, positively changed and why weren't we informed? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.