Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Finally we agree. The scope in the project has changed and that is why we are coming back to this House for approval for that change. Up until that approval happens, the authority given to the Assembly remains with that project. The reason we're coming back now is because a request has been made and we've agreed at the first stage, but we need the authority of the Assembly to move beyond this next stage. If the Assembly does not approve of it, then the project, as the department is trying to put in place now, will not proceed until it receives approval of this Assembly.

I guess there's some difference there in the sense of when that notification should go out. But the fact is the scope is changing and that is why we're back here at the table, have come through the supplementary appropriation process, brought it to committee to inform them of this, and now into Committee of the Whole. Should we tighten up on this and have the Ministers go before committees

as they are planning to do this? I guess that's something we can have further discussion on and it may be a bit more appropriate at that point. But I'm informed that every time this was requested for carryover, that it was identified that the department was looking at alternative options that may come along. So the specific location wasn't identified until recently, which is now kicked into this process. Thank you.