Madam Chair, I can certainly outline the reasons why the extra funding was necessary for the delivery of the program by Education, Culture and Employment. I can't answer the specific question about the impact on the Housing Corporation of the loss of the money. But basically, the biggest parts of the money, or the biggest parts for the requirement of the money, were around regional staff to be able to deliver the program. There are some 1,300 cases now that income support people will be talking to about social housing that they are not seeing already through income support. That drives up the workload. Because of that, we're increasing not in one or two or three discrete positions in most places; for the most part we're increasing where we have a part-time worker who may now be working half-time, we may be trying to get them to bump up their day to three-quarters time. Or we may have situations where we can increase by half a position. Not so much by adding a person, but it's mostly going to be through increasing the hours of work for people who are already working for us. That's where the majority of the money goes, is increasing the regional allocation of people at the community level for staffing.
But in terms of the impact on the Housing Corporation, Madam Chair, I am not able to answer that question, no.