Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We are in a House in the sense of the Assembly and this truly is the area to create some type of debate. Although I don't want to belabour something that may be seen as fruitless, I would like to discuss and explore a little bit for a moment the matter of my concept of a pan-territorial model. If we thought of it in the context of full cost accounting where we would pay for somebody to provide services, which we do already. In my mind, I can sit here from a Legislature point of view and look at this situation where I can see us justifying two more staff lawyers in an office to help things move a little faster. We can certainly farm them out to Nunavut or whatnot. I wouldn't want to close the door to the concept. Maybe it's a model we want to discuss directly with Alberta, I don't know. If we don't have enough lawyers to handle our family law cases. I guess that's a signal that we either aren't doing them right or we just don't have enough staff. I don't know. This is not my specific area of expertise, but it does tell me that some element is going wrong there and if we're having a continual backlog of between 80 and 100, that tells me we're missing at least one more lawyer, maybe two more lawyers. I am not sure. I look for the expertise of the Minister and his deputy to tell me would that make the difference.

Why don't we create some type of agreement that we could look at exploring these options? Again, you are right; it probably is more costly to share or work with Nunavut, but justice shouldn't necessarily be seen based around cost. It's about fairness and effectiveness. I just want to make sure we are doing the right job under the right factors. I would like to hear some thoughts about that whereas the Minister looks at beefing up the legal aid office with two more family law lawyers in the concept of working with another agency, another region, so we can maybe do some cost sharing when we have slow times and busy times. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.