So then there was, yes, as the Minister said, several influences. It seems, from this explanation, that there are a couple of them that were outside of our strategic interest or outside our strategy. Maybe the Minister can tell me who it was, what part of the industry it was that said they were going to withdraw unless we gave up our diamond marks. Mr. Chairman, what was going on here? Was somebody kind of blackmailing us, or threatening us? Did the Minister have to do this? I guess what concerns me here is that we're allowing ourselves to be dictated to, Mr. Chairman, by other sectors of the industry, naturally, and given that some of them are here...I have a number of constituents who work for the cutting and polishing industry and I hold their concerns at the very top of my agenda. But some of these explanations here just seem to indicate that we're letting other people dictate our strategy or negotiate our strategy with us, rather than this government setting the terms that it thinks is good for them.
So this is the sense that I have of why we ended up kind of blowing up our diamond unit and giving up on some of these broader, longer-term, more visionary strategies, even though they may not have been giving us a quicker return or going in quite the right direction. Why were we so quick to walk away from some of this stuff, Mr. Chairman?