Mr. Chairman, I thank the Member for the question. Let me say that as we've worked through the agreement with the GTC, we are learning, I think, how to effectively implement these agreements and we will use that knowledge to help us build the one in the Sahtu. We are currently working with SSI. We have provided them with some help in order to bring together some of the pieces that we need as we move forward on this strategy. I want to assure the Member that the regional superintendent has been identified as the lead point person on the negotiations here and is working very closely with the contractor and is working very closely with SSI, I understand, on moving this forward. He will be the one point of contact for the region.
Now just to make sure there's no confusion, we are responsible for the contract registry, we are the ones putting in place and negotiating, on behalf of the government, this MOU, but it still is up to individual departments to negotiate their own contracts and to handle their own procurement. Nothing we've done in the Gwich'in agreement, in the Sahtu agreement that we're proposing will change that. So where Public Works is the lead department, where Transportation is the lead department, they will still handle all of their procurement. We simply will develop the agreement and report back on it and conduct the yearly meetings to understand how it's working. So our one point of contact will be the regional superintendent, but communities will still have to deal with the various different departments on procurement. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.