Thank you, Madam Chair. I thank the Minister for that. As long as it is everyone and it's not the ones who are working, but it's everyone. That's the important piece that has to be included in this. You can't just talk to the ones that are being successful. You have to find out the ones that aren't working and why they aren't working. So I thank the Minister for that.
One other issue that I just wanted to touch on, and I have mentioned this before, but the Bureau of Statistics -- and I know the Minister is not the Minister of Finance, but I will get to that in a second -- moves over to strategic planning under the Department of Executive. That happens, and all of a sudden the government thinks it's important to have a macroeconomic policy division located within the Department of Finance. Is it a coincidence that they lost the Bureau of Stats and now they want to replace it with something? I don't think it's a coincidence. I just think that's the nature of government and them wanting to replace something.
What I am getting at with the Minister of ITI is I know that the Department of ITI has an investment and economic analysis division that certainly, given the history of our economy, the pipeline from Norman Wells, we produce 14 percent of the world's total production of diamonds, we are on the verge of this mega pipeline project, surely to God we have been doing some work on macroeconomic policy with this government and it has happened in your department, Mr. Minister.
I wonder to myself -- and I am wondering out loud now to my colleagues -- was there ever a discussion to include the new macroeconomic policy division inside ITI where it would be more of a fit? It doesn't belong in Finance. It belongs in your shop. You have been doing the work for a number of years. Thank you, Madam Chair.