Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would generally think this would fall much better under the ENR mandate. Is there a specific reason, more than the Minister has offered, I guess? It just seems unusual that our environmental expertise falls under the ENR side. Is this more of a bean counting perspective, or is this actually a search and go find our environmental liabilities like any known or unknown oil slick we have, or something of that range? I can't describe what environmental liabilities are, but is this more of a financial side of the argument, or is this a search and find the actual spills? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Robert Hawkins on Committee Motion 25-15(4): Recommendation To Record The Taltson Hydro Project In The Capital Plan And Present The Business Case For The Project, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on February 22nd, 2006. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 25-15(4): Recommendation To Record The Taltson Hydro Project In The Capital Plan And Present The Business Case For The Project, Carried
Item 16: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 22nd, 2006
Page 1265
See context to find out what was said next.