Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'd be pleased to visit Smith. How does June 9th sound?

---Applause

But thanks for the offer. Mr. Chairman, I'm fully aware of the complexities of the forest fire management department and all the things that they're up against. All I'm saying is the forest fire management policy is too old; it's an old policy. What's wrong with updating it and making it more concise and more clear, so that people understand exactly where human life, property, equipment, resources, cultural and wildlife sit on that list? I don't see what the big problem is with making some amendments to a policy that's outdated and people don't know anything about. So I'm not saying change the intent of the policy, I'm just saying it's time for an update. There's some additions to that policy. I know resource values, when people think about going to fight a fire based on resource values, they're probably thinking there's a mine out there or an exploration activity happening out there or stuff like that. They don't look at wildlife as a resource in many, at the heat of the moment, type thing, and you have to go out. If you're flying out in a helicopter going to fight a fire based on a resource value and they say why and it's because of caribou lichen, they'll be shaking their heads and wondering what is that all about and they won't understand the value of that. I'm just saying the department should revisit that and maybe put that into the policy as a definite priority for this government to retain some of those important feeding and migratory areas. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.