Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Well, we'll definitely be looking forward to that because it's not, to me it's not really a complex issue. It's something that could be easily brought forward for the public input and I'm sure the public will buy into it. You'll just have to give them the policy right now and say we're going to add this, and add this, and add that, and everybody says great; that's great. We got more things of value added to this values at risk list and I don't see how people would say, gee, we're not going to fight fires because of feeding grounds or migratory routes. I don't think people would be opposed to that to add everything out there, wildlife, it doesn't have to just specifically be caribou. It could be bison or marten, lynx, white fox, anything. I think people would be more inclined to give their consent and blessing to any policy that gets updated, especially in this government. Like I said, you know, some policies are written in stone, it seems, and changing them is like work for the government. I don't see what's wrong with that and people would be happy to embrace it. So thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Chairman.
Robert Villeneuve on Committee Motion 28-15(4): Recommendation That Maca And Enr Draft Stay Clean Strategies For Communities, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on February 23rd, 2006. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 28-15(4): Recommendation That Maca And Enr Draft Stay Clean Strategies For Communities, Carried
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 23rd, 2006
Page 1324
See context to find out what was said next.