Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We think it can be a focal point and exactly the nature of the park, the amount of tourism it can handle each year, the amount of infrastructure is all up for discussion. Of course, in the Government of the Northwest Territories agreement, the Government of Canada with the Sahtu Dene/Metis claim, the nature of the park is laid out, but the plan is not formalized. So there are a number of steps moving forward that we have to deliver on now, but I think this discussion with this committee will help us to do that. But we do have to have some discussion. We know the land is set aside for this purpose, about the amount of traffic that we want to see in the region, that we can accommodate in the region, and the nature of the attraction. But I think all of this discussion is now moving ahead. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Brendan Bell on Question 470-15(4): Canol Heritage Trail
In the Legislative Assembly on February 27th, 2006. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 470-15(4): Canol Heritage Trail
Question 470-15(4): Canol Heritage Trail
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 26th, 2006
Page 1375
See context to find out what was said next.