Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I guess I am going to lose the argument again today. I lost it last week when I tried to move a motion to pull the $491,000 out of the Department of Finance. I guess I am just going to have to take a different mindset on this. I believe if you are going to go through a process of coordinating government functions and go down that road, this shouldn't have been allowed to happen. Again, I get back to the coincidence. Is it a coincidence that the Bureau of Stats moved out of Finance one day and, all of a sudden, they want to replace it with something else? We can't miss that interpretation. That's the interpretation that I get. I am not saying that the work doesn't need to get done. Somebody, obviously, has been doing it for a number of years. We don't produce 14 percent of the world's total production of diamonds; we don't have a pipeline from Norman Wells without some of that macro socio-economic policy work getting done somewhere. I know the Finance Minister told me the other day that it has been getting done. Since 1999, it's been getting done in house.

Again, I just want to state again, for the record, that if you are looking at true coordination, that division or the new policy division belongs in the Department of Executive and it belongs under the heading of the Bureau of Statistics and it fits nicely in there. It doesn't belong in Finance, in my mind, but I guess I am outnumbered on that one. That's my feeling on it, Mr. Chairman. Thank you.