Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The decision was made to put the macroeconomic section in Finance mainly because of the fiscal characteristic of macroeconomics. In the old days, or up until now, we basically get a grant. We get money from the federal government and we just manage expenditures. We really don't need to have a macroeconomic section. But when, as a government, we evolve more and more with province-like responsibilities, with resource revenues, then we will not only look at how we spend our money but we are also looking at how the money is invested, what's happening to global markets, what's the best way of us dealing with things like trust funds, heritage funds, with taxation policies. There are a whole host of things that fit into macroeconomics.

So, Madam Chair...Sorry, Mr. Chair, at this time, it's our decision to place it in Finance. We may, at some point, want to revisit that. At this time, after reviewing it, it was Cabinet and Financial Management Board's decision that that probably rightfully belongs more in Finance, although one could argue that it should be in the Executive, or in ITI, or wherever else. Because of the fiscal importance of it, we chose to put it there. Thank you.