Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Okay. That gets back to my original question, then, about getting the aboriginal organizations to be more autonomous, at arm's length with the GNWT in their own land claim issues and devolution. So how does this government expect to even...You know, some of these land claim talks could last another 10 years. How are we going to approach devolution with these unknowns? How are we going to even talk about devolution? Why are we even talking about devolution if we know it could be fragmented? It could just all crash down anytime now. Anytime that any aboriginal organization decides to pull the plug, devolution could just go down the drain. So with all the work, and the money, and the resources that all the other aboriginal groups are putting together, putting into this whole process, and then somebody comes up with the bright

idea that, yes, it's not going to work because we have a better idea. So I just want to know, why are we always just on one path to devolution and resource revenue sharing and maybe we should start thinking of a contingency plan or a contingency organization, organizational approach or management negotiation tactics or something that would address these as we go along and when they do come up, say, you know...What do we do if the pipeline starts construction before anything is signed, like resource revenue sharing and stuff like that? What options will we have after that? Is that something that Aboriginal Affairs researches? Is there any plan B, is what I want to know, Mr. Chairman.